Researchers find why depression and ageing linked to increased disease risk

value= This page was printed from: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/284100.php Visit www.medicalnewstoday.com for medical news & health news headlines posted all through the day, every day. © 2004-2014 All rights reserved. MNT is the registered trade mark of MediLexicon International Restricted. SyndContentImpl.interface=interface com.sun.syndication.feed.synd.SyndContent SyndContentImpl.type=text/html SyndContentImpl

Ebola: Resist the tendency to over-react

value= While driving to work, I listened to Mike and Mike (a radio sports speak show). Mike Greenberg made a marvelous point about his job. He outlined what they do as “professional over-reactors.” They take every game & extrapolate, more often than not irrationally, about the implications of that game. Does this remind you of wellness reporting? A study appears in a serious medical journal, plus the press “blows it up” as the next excellent advance. Yet scientific understanding grows slowly, with fits & begins. Too frequently initial study reports aren’t confirmed with later studies. While this really is a considerable challenge, perhaps a bigger challenge occurs when a new illness or epidemic occurs. Loads of opine seriously and profess to have the answers. A lot of use the retrospectoscope to criticize public health, or individual physicians or other well being care workers. Generally the critiques of the situation take a serious health issue and use it to highlight an concern that they want to espouse. Likely I am guilty of this tendency. I wrote lately concerning the emergency department missing the 1st Ebola patient’s diagnosis to highlight my concern about diagnostic accuracy. Others have used this unfortunate story to highlight complications about electronic wellness records. We use anecdotes to highlight our concerns. Potentially we overreact. However our concerns pale compared to political candidates. We now have the Republicans blaming the Democrats and vice versa for the Ebola epidemic. Balderdash! Neither side makes a convincing case, and they have each stooped to using a public well being crisis to make political hay. As we work to understand the Ebola epidemic, we have a responsibility to not over-react. We should let the public well being pro’s and the infectious disease experts carefully examine the information. Our over-reacting just leads to hysteria. To be sure the press will continue to over-react and politicians will over-react, and bloggers will over-react. That is what we do. Though are we helping anyone? Are we just fueling hysteria? What do you think? Robert Centor is an internal medication physician who blogs at DB’s Medical Rants. SyndContentImpl.interface=interface com.sun.syndication.feed.synd.SyndContent SyndContentImpl.type=text/html SyndContentImpl

Did Nose Cells Help Paralyzed Man Walk?

value= By Peter Russell WebMD Well being News Reviewed by Keith Barnard, MD Oct. 21, 2014 – A group of doctors & scientists say a paralyzed man has been able to walk once again after surgery in which nerve cells from his nasal cavity were transplanted into his spinal cord. Darek Fidyka, a 38-year-old Bulgarian who was left paralyzed from the chest down when he was stabbed in an attack in 2010, is now in a position to walk once again working with a frame, and he’s regained feeling in his legs, doctors say. Although many pro’s warn that the medical evidence is far from conclusive, and it would be wrong to give incorrect hope to individuals expecting a remedy for paralysis. Reported Details The surgery was done in Poland in partnership with scientists led by Dr. Geoffrey Raisman, a professor at the Spinal Repair Unit at UCL Institute of Neurology in London. Treating folks with a complete spinal cord injury has commonly been unsuccessful, due to the fact no methods exist to regenerate severed spinal nerves across the injured vicinity. Now physicians & scientists say they have been able to restore some lower limb function & a few sensation by transplanting what are known as olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) from the patient’s nose. These cells send the sense of smell from the nasal lining to the brain. The patient’s own OECs were transplanted into his spinal cord, plus a “nerve bridge” making use of several lower limb nerves was built between two stumps of the damaged spinal column. Previous studies with animals recommend OECs have excellent regeneration powers, while constructing nerve bridges is a time-honored surgical process. But the two strategies hadn’t been used together before. Particulars of the treatment have been published in the journal Cell Transplantation & will be featured in a BBC Panorama program. A Breakthrough? Dr. Pawel Tabakow of the Wroclaw Medical School in Poland says in a statement: “Previous to the transplantation, we estimated that without this treatment, our patient’s recovery chances were less than 1%. On the other hand, we observed a gradual recovery of each sensory and motor function that began 4 months after the surgery.” Raisman says in a statement: “We think that this process is the breakthrough which — as it is further developed — will result in a historic change in the presently hopeless outlook for men and women disabled by spinal cord injury. “We are currently raising the funds to mount an Anglo-Polish initiative to verify the advantages of this procedure with further patients.” 2nd Opinion Nonetheless, the findings have not convinced quite a few experts that this is a major breakthrough for men and women with paralysis. Commenting in a statement, Dr. Simone Di Giovanni, chair in Restorative Neuroscience for Imperial University London, says that one case of improvement “cannot represent any solid scientific evidence to elaborate upon. In truth, there is no evidence that the transplant is responsible for the reported neurological improvement. SyndContentImpl.interface=interface com.sun.syndication.feed.synd.SyndContent SyndContentImpl.type=text/html SyndContentImpl

Did Nose Cells Help Paralyzed Man Walk?

value= By Peter Russell WebMD Wellness News Reviewed by Keith Barnard, MD Oct. 21, 2014 – A group of doctors and scientists say a paralyzed man has been in a position to walk once more after surgery in which nerve cells from his nasal cavity were transplanted into his spinal cord. Darek Fidyka, a 38-year-old Bulgarian who was left paralyzed from the chest down when he was stabbed in an attack in 2010, is now able to walk once more working with a frame, & he’s regained feeling in his legs, physicians say. Yet quite a few experts warn that the medical evidence is far from conclusive, and it would be inaccurate to give false hope to folks expecting a cure for paralysis. Reported Details The surgery was done in Poland in partnership with scientists led by Dr. Geoffrey Raisman, a professor at the Spinal Repair Unit at UCL Institute of Neurology in London. Treating people with a complete spinal cord injury has in the main been unproductive, because no strategies exist to regenerate severed spinal nerves across the injured vicinity. Now doctors & scientists say they have been in a position to restore several lower limb function & quite a few sensation by transplanting what are known as olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) from the patient’s nose. These cells send the sense of smell from the nasal lining to the brain. The patient’s own OECs were transplanted into his spinal cord, and a “nerve bridge” working with many lower limb nerves was built between 2 stumps of the damaged spinal column. Preceding studies with animals suggest OECs have good regeneration powers, while constructing nerve bridges is a time-honored surgical procedure. But the 2 tactics hadn’t been used together before. Details of the treatment have already been published in the journal Cell Transplantation & will be featured in a BBC Panorama program. A Breakthrough? Dr. Pawel Tabakow of the Wroclaw Medical University in Poland says in a statement: “Earlier to the transplantation, we estimated that without this treatment, our patient’s recovery chances were less than 1%. Nevertheless, we observed a gradual recovery of both sensory and motor function that began 4 months after the surgery.” Raisman says in a statement: “We think that this procedure is the breakthrough which — as it is further developed — will result in a historic change in the at the moment hopeless outlook for people disabled by spinal cord injury. “We’re presently raising the funds to mount an Anglo-Polish initiative to verify the advantages of this strategy with further patients.” Second Opinion Still, the findings have not convinced some experts that this is a major breakthrough for men and women with paralysis. Commenting in a statement, Dr. Simone Di Giovanni, chair in Restorative Neuroscience for Imperial School London, says that 1 case of improvement “can not represent any solid scientific evidence to elaborate upon. In truth, there is no evidence that the transplant is responsible for the reported neurological improvement. SyndContentImpl.interface=interface com.sun.syndication.feed.synd.SyndContent SyndContentImpl.type=text/html SyndContentImpl

Ebola: Resist the tendency to over-react

value= While driving to work, I listened to Mike & Mike (a radio sports talk show). Mike Greenberg made a fantastic point about his employment. He described what they do as “specialist over-reactors.” They take every game & extrapolate, frequently irrationally, concerning the implications of that game. Does this remind you of health reporting? A study appears in a serious medical journal, plus the press “blows it up” as the next great advance. However scientific expertise grows slowly, with fits and starts. Too frequently up-front analysis reports are not confirmed with later studies. While this really is a substantial challenge, maybe a bigger issue occurs when a new disease or epidemic occurs. Loads of opine considerably & profess to have the answers. Loads of use the retrospectoscope to criticize public health, or individual physicians or other well being care workers. Mainly the critiques of the circumstance take a serious well being concern and use it to highlight an concern that they want to espouse. Likely I am guilty of this tendency. I wrote recently concerning the emergency department missing the very first Ebola patient’s diagnosis to highlight my concern about diagnostic accuracy. Others have used this unfortunate story to highlight difficulties about electronic health records. We use anecdotes to highlight our concerns. Perhaps we overreact. However our issues pale compared to political candidates. We now have the Republicans blaming the Democrats and vice versa for the Ebola epidemic. Balderdash! Neither side makes a convincing case, and they’ve each stooped to working with a public well being crisis to make political hay. As we work to understand the Ebola epidemic, we’ve a responsibility to not over-react. We have to let the public wellness specialists plus the infectious illness experts meticulously examine the info. Our over-reacting just leads to hysteria. As you can imagine the press will continue to over-react and politicians will over-react, & bloggers will over-react. That’s what we do. Although are we helping any one? Are we just fueling hysteria? What do you think? Robert Centor is an internal medicine physician who blogs at DB’s Medical Rants. SyndContentImpl.interface=interface com.sun.syndication.feed.synd.SyndContent SyndContentImpl.type=text/html SyndContentImpl

Food professionals’ relationships with food organizations: a Q along with a

value= In the past few weeks, I have been sent many questions asking my opinion of food professionals’ relationships with food businesses.   I thought I would cope with them at 1 time (all are edited for succinctness & clarity): Q.  I am a food science student attracted to profession possibilities in the food industry. I love food science and truly think that processing food is a excellent thought that may positively impact the planet & its men and women.  I need to do something worthwhile,, although I still need to eat.  Can’t the food industry be transformed from the inside? Cannot you advise marvelous businesses, individuals, or places where I could start my search?  A.  I have met social entrepreneurs who strongly think that firms may be ethical, do good, & nonetheless make heaps of money.  Perhaps so.  If you are going to try that route, I think it essential that the company be family or cooperatively owned, & not publicly traded.  You may take a consider food institutions incorporated as Benefit Corporations. These are now authorized in about half the states to contemplate the interests of all stakeholders, not just shareholders, when making decisions.  They are unique from B corporations certifying businesses that meet certain sustainability criteria. Countless firms work difficult to minimize their environmental impact.  Nonetheless the genuine question is what they are doing about health impact.  Are they going overboard on well being claims?  Are they marketing to children?  These are questions I’d need to ask.  Inside your shoes, I’d start by looking into firms making products that you like, feel splendid about, & would be proud to be associated with.   And then take a closer look at how the firms operate.   Working for food companies is continually a fantastic studying experience, yet in case you honestly want to adjust the world, you may be better off with a nonprofit agency. Q.  I’m a graduate student in nutrition & I would like to know what recommendations you could have for pupils to navigate conflicts of interest with food companies when beginning a employment.  I intend to pursue an academic career although am concerned that my credibility as a scientist might be compromised by my participation in market-place-funded publications & investigation.  A.  It’s fantastic that you are asking such questions. From the standpoint of ethics, that’s an beneficial first step.  You ought to most unquestionably publish your study, no matter how it is funded.  Be certain to disclose potential sources of funding bias & conflicts of interest.  While you are doing your research, you can take particular care to control for potential biases—conscious & unconscious—in your study design, conduct, and interpretation to ensure that they are not influenced by the funder.  In in search of assignments, you might start thinking about those in academia, government, and NGOs which are less likely to demand you to compromise principles.  Finding such jobs may not be simple, but you will be OK should you are on the whole ethically transparent and as easy about biases as it is doable to be. Q.  Do you think that relationships between the food industry and nutrition professional institutions like the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (&) and the Association for Nutritional Science (ASN) are problematic? Why? A.  Sponsorship by food product makers puts nutrition experts in conflict of interest.   Nutritionists need to be advising prospects and the public about what to eat to remain healthy & prevent chronic disease.  This necessarily indicates spotlighting consumption of a few foods however discouraging consumption of others.  Nutritionists cannot speak truth to customers & guard corporate sponsorship at the same time.  If nothing else, food sector sponsorship delivers the appearance of conflict of interest & makes & and ASN turn up as arms of food company marketers.  But it also affects—or appears to affect-& ‘s & ASN’s positions on key troubles in nutrition & well being.  Overall, monetary relationships between these corporations & their food sector sponsors undermines the credibility of their positions on food troubles. Q.  What sort of modifications do you think the Academy demands to make to be able to make food sector relationships more beneficial to its members plus the public overall? A.  Nutrition & food professional companies need to establish a firewall between corporate sponsorship & content or opinion.  This demands setting up rigorous guidelines for what food organisations can and cannot expect from their donations.  They ought to not, i.e., be permitted to sponsor content sessions at meetings, not least since opinions expressed at sponsored sessions hardly ever show up objective.  The companies will need to have complete control over how & where corporate donations & company logos are used. Q.  How can relationships between health specialists and the food business be beneficial for public wellness overall? A.  The role of well being specialists is to give the finest advice attainable about diet & wellness.  The role of food firms is to provide profits to shareholders.  These objectives are not the same and are only rarely compatible.  In my experience, people who want to work for food companies to alter corporate culture from within do so from good motives, in spite of this soon discover that corporate imperatives take precedence over well being goals. If health expert organizations want their assistance to be taken seriously, they must establish and remain faithful to rules and guidelines developed expressly to shield their integrity. Q.  I read your post on the revolving door,  It seems to me that your underlying principle is the belief that any company that makes food is indicted as part of the huge evil food conspiracy. Surely, you cannot honestly think that.  A.  Of course I don’t. But food businesses aren’t social service agencies.   Their job—their legal responsibility—is to nearly always broaden sales and distribute ever-growing profits to shareholders.   If they can do this & promote wellness at the same time, more power to them.  Although folks would be healthier eating food, not food items.  Within our present procedure, goods are far more financially rewarding and the focus on them is rarely works in the interest of public well being. Food and nutrition professionals need to make a living.  Unfortunately, work in industry pay better-& more often than not a lot better-than work in government or NGOs.  That’s the real problem that underlies all of these questions. SyndContentImpl.interface=interface com.sun.syndication.feed.synd.SyndContent SyndContentImpl.type=text/html SyndContentImpl

Shaking up cell biology

value= Elvis did it, Michael Jackson did it, and so do the mitochondria in our cells. They shake. While Elvis and Michael shook for decades before loud and appreciative audiences, mitochondrial oscillations have quietly bewildered scientists for more than 40 years. Now, a team of scientists at National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Investigation (NIDCR) has imaged mitochondria for the very first time oscillating in a live animal, in this case, the salivary glands of laboratory rats. The report, published online today in the journal Cell Reports, shows the oscillations happen spontaneously & frequently in the rodent cells, which leads the researchers to think the oscillations in essence surely also occur in human cells. “The movements could last from tens of seconds to minutes, which was far longer & principally at a faster tempo than observed previously in cell culture,” mentioned Roberto Weigert, Ph.D., an NIDCR scientist and senior author on the study. The mitochondria also show up to synchronize their movements not only in an individual cell although, quite unexpectedly, into a linked network of oscillators vibrating throughout the tissue. “You read through the microscope, & it just about looks like a synchronized dance,” said Weigert. “The synchronization, to borrow an old cliché, tells us that we want to differentiate the forest from the trees — and vice versa — when studying mitochondria. It could be that the forest holds the key to understanding how mitochondria function in human well being & illness.” The mitochondrion (the singular of mitochondria) is of 1 of many distinct compartments, or organelles, in the cell cytoplasm. Even though mitochondria are jacks of a large number of biochemical trades, they are best known as the power plants of the cell. They create a continuous supply of the molecule ATP that, like bits of coal, serve as the cell’s main source of energy to energy the heart to beat, muscles to stretch, and practically every movement that the body makes. To keep cells entirely invoiced, mitochondria operate four biochemical production lines that coalesce with oxygen molecules from normal respiration to deliver ATP. 1 of these production lines starts with processing the molecule nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, or NADH. Weigert and colleagues recognized that they could use their high-magnificati on microscope to imagine NADH as it naturally emits electrons as part of the ATP production process. The key was their choice of microscopy. Weigert and colleagues are masters of intravital microscopy, an exceptionally high-resolution method that dates back to the 19th century. It had been too potent to use in live animals until recently. “Animals breathe, their hearts beat, & their appendages twitch,” mentioned Weigert. “The combined impact below incredibly high magnification is like watching a 6.0 earthquake. Everything shakes and blurs out of focus. We have developed approaches to better stabilize our organ of interest and lessen the motion artifacts. At this point, it’s just a matter of generating more powerful optics to envision the chemistry of life that really unfolds in the body, not under artificial laboratory conditions that tension cells and likely modify their behavior.” The potent optics allowed the scientists to picture the oscillations in their native milieu & to puzzle over their trigger. Decided by a series of subsequent experiments and observations, the researchers identified that the oscillations are linked to the production of reactive oxygen species, a chemically interactive byproduct of making ATP. This finding suggests that the oscillations likely are not inherent to mitochondria but a response to conditions in their environment. “These findings emphasize how vital it is scientifically to study biology on its own terms, not below artificial laboratory conditions,” stated Natalie Porat-Shliom, an NIDCR scientist & lead author on the paper. “We saw factors in live animals that you do not see in cell culture. The causes, in this case, rather well could be that the mitochondria continue to receive an influx of signals from the blood vessels, the nervous tactic, and their surrounding environment. The entire procedure can not be reassembled n cell culture.” Porat-Shliom noted that these findings will need to be of broad interest scientifically in framing studies of mitochondria, & could have future clinical implications. An estimated 2 million Americans have mitochondrial illness, an energy-depleting failure of mitochondria to function appropriately, which can have disabling effects on the brain, heart, kidneys, & other body methods. A number of scientists also suspect that as mitochondria grow to be better understood, they likely will be understood to play a more prominent role in human wellness & disease. The National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Study (NIDCR) is the nation’s leading funder of study on oral, dental, and craniofacial wellness. Visit http://www.nidcr.nih.gov. About the National Institutes of Well being (NIH): NIH, the nation’s medical research agency, contains 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the main federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, & translational medical investigation, & is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both widespread and uncommon illnesses. For more details about NIH & its programs, visit www.nih.gov. NIH…Turning Discovery Into Health® ### SyndContentImpl.interface=interface com.sun.syndication.feed.synd.SyndContent SyndContentImpl.type=text/html SyndContentImpl

Facts & Myths About Physical Therapy

value= Every year, a number of 9-million adult Americans use physical therapy services. Even so, many men and women are unfamiliar with physical therapy or have misperceptions about what physical therapy is. That’s why the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) had October designated National Physical Therapy Month. What is Physical Therapy? As part of National Physical Therapy Month’s education efforts, a good starting point is defining what physical therapy is: Physical therapy is the treatment of illness or injury making use of therapeutic workouts and other interventions that focus on enhancing range of motion, posture, strength, endurance, balance, coordination, joint mobility, and flexibility – along with on alleviating discomfort. The goal of physical therapy is to help patients regain their capacity to complete functional activities associated with daily living. Physical therapy furthermore could be an essential part of the recovery process for lots of injuries, illnesses, and surgeries. Debunking Physical Therapy Myths The APTA also is working with National Physical Therapy Month as an opportunity to debunk numerous myths about physical therapy. 1. Myth: I need a referral to see a physical therapist. Truth: A recent survey by the APTA revealed that 70 % of men and women think that a referral or prescription is necessary to be seen by a physical therapist. In fact, all 50 states permit patients to be evaluated by a physical therapist without a physician’s previous referral. It’s accurate, in spite of this, that a number of states have restrictions regarding the treatment that physical therapists can provide without a physician referral. two. Myth: Physical therapy is painful. Fact: Physical therapists aim to minimize pain and discomfort, such as chronic or long-term pain. Physical therapists won’t exceed a patient’s discomfort threshold as they work to facilitate healing, along with restoring movement and function. The APTA survey furthermore found that – even though 71 percent of those that have never visited a physical therapist think that physical therapy is painful, that number considerably decreases among patients who have observed a physical therapist in the past year. three. Myth: Physical therapy is only for injuries & accidents. Fact: Physical therapists do a lot more than just stretch or strengthen weak muscles after an injury or surgery. They are adept at evaluating and diagnosing potential troubles before they lead to more serious injuries or disabling conditions – from carpal tunnel syndrome and frozen shoulder – to chronic headaches and lower back pain, to cite just one or two examples. 4. Myth: Any wellness-care expert can perform physical therapy. Reality: Although 42% of buyers are aware that physical therapy can only be performed by a licensed physical therapist, 37% nonetheless think that other well being-care pro’s can also administer physical therapy. It’s also worth noting that physical therapists are obliged to pass a medical board exam in order to acquire their license to treat patients. five. Myth: Physical therapy is not addressed by insurance. Truth: Most wellness insurance covers some form of physical therapy. 6. Myth: Surgery is my only alternative. Truth: Physical therapy, in a few instances, can be as useful as surgery in treating a variety of conditions – from rotator-cuff tears and degenerative disk disease – to meniscal tears & some forms of knee osteoarthritis. 7. Myth: I can do physical therapy myself. Reality: While patients’ participation is key to a prosperous treatment plan, every patient nonetheless needs the guidance of a licensed physical therapist who has specialized education, clinical expertise, plus the most current accessible research findings to make individualized plans of care. Sources http://www.apta.org/NPTM/ https://www.athletico.com/2011/09/27/the-top-10-things-you-did-not-know-about-physical-therapy/ http://weblog.theravid.com/patient-care/eight-thought-provoking-details-physical-therapy-ignore/ http://www.hmsa.com/help-center/physical-&-occupational-therapy-advantages/ http://www.medicinenet.com/script/principal/art.asp?articlekey=11885 http://www.moveforwardpt.com/NPTM/Default.aspx#.VDr75fldU2t http://www.moveforwardpt.com/Resources/Detail.aspx?cid=88d27545-6154-4ba6-a844-9dbb97a0ff93#.VDr2wvldU2v . Bookmark the . SyndContentImpl.interface=interface com.sun.syndication.feed.synd.SyndContent SyndContentImpl.type=text/html SyndContentImpl

WHO Admits Botched Response to Ebola in Africa

N. wellness agency, news service reports WebMD News from HealthDay By Margaret Farley Steele HealthDay Reporter FRIDAY, Oct. 17, 2014 (HealthDay News) — The World Well being Organization has admitted it dropped the ball with the Ebola epidemic in West Africa, according to a news report published Friday. In a draft internal memo obtained by the Associated Press, WHO blamed incompetent staff & other elements for not curbing at the outset what is now the biggest Ebola outbreak in history. “Almost everyone involved in the outbreak response failed to see several fairly plain writing on the wall,” WHO officials said in the post, based on the AP. In a region with substandard health methods & unsealed borders, it must have already been clear that the usual infection-control methods would not work, the U.N. well being agency memo said. As of Wednesday, 4,493 folks had died out of 8,997 reported circumstances of Ebola infection, according to WHO. Almost all cases & deaths have happened in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone. WHO officials now say that there could be ten,000 new cases of Ebola every week inside 2 months if the battle against the deadly virus is not stepped up. Blasting its own bureaucrats, the WHO memo said the heads of the agency’s national offices in Africa are “politically motivated appointments” made by the WHO regional director for Africa. As a “particularly alarming” example, it said the head of its Guinea office would not help get visas for Ebola experts attempting to enter the country. So far, Guinea has had more than 840 deaths attributed to the virus. 1 of the scientists who discovered the Ebola virus echoed the criticism. “It is the regional office in Africa that is the front line,” Dr. Peter Piot told the AP on Friday. “& they did not do anything. That workplace is often not competent. “I called for a state of emergency to be declared in July and for military operations to be deployed,” Piot told the news service

Wholesome Way of life Might Enhance Breast Cancer Survival

16, 2014 (HealthDay News) — Exercise, wholesome eating & remarkable weight control could help strengthen survival of breast cancer patients, in accordance with a sizeable-scale assessment. Researchers analyzed 85 studies that included more than 164,000 women worldwide & found that breast cancer patient survival could be associated with: a wholesome weight, physical activity, eating foods with fiber and soy and lower fat intake, primarily saturated fat. In spite of this, the report from the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) and the World Cancer Analysis Fund International’s Continuous Update Project does say that right now accessible evidence is nonetheless not powerful adequate to make firm recommendations for breast cancer survivors. The findings do assistance AICR recommendations that all cancer survivors eat a plant-based diet, preserve a wholesome weight & get usual exercise. “While it is difficult to make certain recommendations, the investigation suggests that girls who have a healthy weight and are physically active, each before & after they are diagnosed, have a better chance of surviving a diagnosis of breast cancer & of not getting a 2nd main breast cancer,” Dr. Anne McTiernan, leader of the panel that wrote the report and a researcher at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Analysis Center in Seattle, mentioned in an AICR news release. “We want to know more about the effects of other factors on the associations between life-style and survival, including distinct types of tumors, the stage at which a tumor is found, former cancer treatment, & socioeconomic areas,” she added. Earlier trials have shown that a healthy weight lowers the risk for 8 cancers, including postmenopausal breast cancer, based on the AICR. “We know there are a good deal of factors for women to eat a plant-based diet & be active, each for cancer prevention and overall well being,” Alice Bender, associate director for nutrition programs at AICR, stated in the news release. “For survivors, start where you’re & search for little alterations you could make. For example, take benefit of the times you feel best to walk or move in a lot of way. Use pre-chopped or frozen vegetables as an uncomplicated method to boost your healthy diet,” she advised. Each year in the United States, more than 232,000 ladies are diagnosed with breast cancer, in accordance with the AICR. Right now, there are more than 3.1 million breast cancer survivors in the United States, the AICR reported. — Robert Preidt Copyright © 2014 HealthDay